نوشته اصلی توسط
iGeek
با توجه به مصرف منابع کمتر و نداشتن رابط گرافیکی به نظر میرسه که اوبونتو سرور باید بیشتر پایدار باشه. شما از چه نظری CentOS رو پایدارتر میدونید؟ به علت اینکه بسته های آپدیتش خیلی کمتر از ابونتو هست میگین؟
من به خاطر API Stability میگم:
کد:
If you're supporting a product that was deployed on an RHEL box,
you don't have to worry about the underlying technology the product uses having it's API change
(with new versions of apache, php, perl, python, glibc, whatever).
This even applies to most kernel modules provided for RHEL.
As an example, if I've developed a web application that runs on RHEL 5.0,
I can be fairly certain that it will continue to run on RHEL 5.6 two years later,
all the while the RHEL system has been getting security updates and bug fixes the whole time.
چیزی که خود Redhat توی features میگه:
کد:
More secure applications.
Protection against commonly exploited security flaws, like buffer overflows integrated in the standard software stack.
The highest-grade protection via the SELinux security feature, protecting system services from attacks, offering full transparency, and making it easy to extend and adopt.
Smart card authentication support.
پاسخ : Ubuntu Server یا CentOS ؟
